Cocaine v. Crack Cocaine
The question is why ? Why is there such a tremendous difference between the number of years sentenced dealing with the same drug. Crack is cocaine; therefore cocaine is crack.
COCAINE: is an akaloid that is found in the leaves of a South American plant known as Erythroxylon coca. Cocaine induces a sense of euphoria and exhilaration. Cocaine is an addicitive stimulant drug, the powdered hydrochloride salt form of cocaine can be snorted or even injected once dissolved in water.
CRACK COCAINE: is a free-based form of cocaine that is processed using baking soda to make a crystal rock that can be smoked. The term crack refers to the sound that the substance makes while being heated. Crack cocaine have the same effects of euphoria and a feeling of a joy, and pleasure just as the powder form cocaine.
Not knowing a lot about the drug one can conclude that they are pretty much the same substance. Cocaine is the pure form in a powder substance and crack cocaine is cocaine just broken down with another substance and turned into a rock so that it can be smoked. So if that is the case then why would the sentencing be more for one then the other if at the end of the day it is the same thing, just prepared and used differently.
Not only that the sentencing for crack cocaine is amazingly higher than cocaine. This in my opinion is completely backwards because if cocaine is the pure form and crack cocaine contains other substances hence it is broken down then why would a person not get more time for using and or distributing cocaine ?
Just something to wrap your mind around…. I think I have a pretty good idea why……



